London is burning
Jul. 9th, 2005 10:26 am(I meant to post this on the day, but I find these days that when I have time to post, I often don't have the brainpower)
My thoughts and prayers are with everyone affected by the London bombings this week.
coeli was wondering why the New York and London bombings affected her much more than the bombings in Madrid. I hadn't thought about it, but I reacted much the same way - I hadn't even remember Madrid until she mentioned it.
I think for me, it comes down to personal connections. I think we often connect to and make sense of tragedies based on how they relate to us, and if the connection isn't there, it never penetrates as far. With New York, there was the fact that I had close family members living and working in Manhattan, the fact that we were on the Garden State Parkway just north of the city when the planes hit and first heard about it on the radio because the announcer had seen the first plane hit from his window, and that I will forever associate that horrible day emotionally with my grandfather's death (he didn't actually die until six weeks after, but we had been in New England saying good-bye to him because it was clear that the end was near).
My emotional connections to London are mostly from the wonderful times I've had visiting there. I don't want to live in a big city, but London often fools me into thinking I might. The life and vibrancy, the layers of history, and the ease of travel. One of the first things I really learned to appreciate about London is the Tube, and the mass-transit advocate in me hates that it would be attacked. My personal connections to London aren't quite as strong as for New York - I've mostly lost touch with my English friends from my six months in Lancaster and I don't think any of them were living in London. But it still occasionally gives me chills that if this had happened two years ago,
longstrider's sister could have been on the Tube during the bombings.
My thoughts and prayers are with everyone affected by the London bombings this week.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I think for me, it comes down to personal connections. I think we often connect to and make sense of tragedies based on how they relate to us, and if the connection isn't there, it never penetrates as far. With New York, there was the fact that I had close family members living and working in Manhattan, the fact that we were on the Garden State Parkway just north of the city when the planes hit and first heard about it on the radio because the announcer had seen the first plane hit from his window, and that I will forever associate that horrible day emotionally with my grandfather's death (he didn't actually die until six weeks after, but we had been in New England saying good-bye to him because it was clear that the end was near).
My emotional connections to London are mostly from the wonderful times I've had visiting there. I don't want to live in a big city, but London often fools me into thinking I might. The life and vibrancy, the layers of history, and the ease of travel. One of the first things I really learned to appreciate about London is the Tube, and the mass-transit advocate in me hates that it would be attacked. My personal connections to London aren't quite as strong as for New York - I've mostly lost touch with my English friends from my six months in Lancaster and I don't think any of them were living in London. But it still occasionally gives me chills that if this had happened two years ago,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)